Skip to content

[basic.fundamental] Rephrase note #8639

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
lprv wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[basic.fundamental] Rephrase note #8639

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions source/basic.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5544,8 +5544,8 @@
The values of type \keyword{bool} are
\keyword{true} and \keyword{false}.
\begin{note}
There are no \keyword{signed}, \keyword{unsigned},
\keyword{short}, or \tcode{\keyword{long} \keyword{bool}} types or values.
The type specifiers \keyword{signed}, \keyword{unsigned},
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer Dec 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We want \grammarterm{type-specifier} here, right?

... which is introduced much later. This is about the fundamental notion of a type, not about any particular expression (using a type-id, for instance). As such, I find the mention of "type specifier" not great.

\keyword{short}, and \keyword{long} cannot be combined with \keyword{bool}.
\end{note}

\pnum
Expand Down