Skip to content

Conversation

@lprv
Copy link
Contributor

@lprv lprv commented Dec 15, 2025

The current note can be misread as attaching only the long modifier to bool (and talking about just the "signed", "unsigned", and "short" types otherwise, all of which are valid type-ids).

\begin{note}
There are no \keyword{signed}, \keyword{unsigned},
\keyword{short}, or \tcode{\keyword{long} \keyword{bool}} types or values.
The type specifiers \keyword{signed}, \keyword{unsigned},
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer Dec 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We want \grammarterm{type-specifier} here, right?

... which is introduced much later. This is about the fundamental notion of a type, not about any particular expression (using a type-id, for instance). As such, I find the mention of "type specifier" not great.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants