Aclarar el requisito del formato del certificado en PEM #9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nroxDev
changed the title
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hola, muchas gracias por crear la librería. Está siendo de gran utilidad.
He detectado que en la documentación no se menciona el tema de los certificados, y me ha llevado bastante tiempo darme cuenta de que actualmente solo se soporta formato PEM, ya que se utiliza el cliente SOAP nativo de PHP, que no admite directamente certificados .p12 / .pfx.
De momento he enviado una PR para dejar esto explícito en la documentación.
Si lo consideráis necesario y entra dentro del roadmap, podría implementarse en el futuro soporte para otros formatos de certificado.
Muchas gracias por vuestro trabajo y por mantener la librería, se agradece mucho.