Skip to content

Conversation

@coax1d
Copy link

@coax1d coax1d commented Mar 13, 2023

No description provided.

@coax1d coax1d self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@OverOrion OverOrion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix, LGTM, I think the hashmarks could be removed if you agree as well.

2. Fork the worker repository `https://github.com/integritee-network/worker.git` from the SDK release branch (`sdk-v0.10.0-polkadot-v0.9.27`).
3. Build the worker in [sidechain mode](4.4.1-sidechain-sdk.md#building-the-worker-in-sidechain-validateer-mode-a-hrefbuild-sidechain-mode-idbuild-sidechain-modea).
4. Write and integrate your own [#business-logic-stf](4.4.1-sidechain-sdk.md#business-logic-stf "mention"), e.g. in a substrate pallet.
4. Write and integrate your own [#business-logic-stf](4.4.4-custom-business-logic-stf/), e.g. in a substrate pallet.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know that the hashmark had been there previously nevertheless could you please remove it?

#### **Business logic / STF**

This is the core part of the code changes necessary to turn the generic worker into your specific use-case. Read more in [#business-logic-stf](4.4.1-sidechain-sdk.md#business-logic-stf "mention").
This is the core part of the code changes necessary to turn the generic worker into your specific use-case. Read more in [#business-logic-stf](4.4.4-custom-business-logic-stf/).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants