Skip to content

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Dec 7, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
logos (source) workspace.dependencies minor 0.15.1 -> 0.16.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge December 7, 2025 11:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Dec 7, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.89%. Comparing base (06cc531) to head (c48355b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8166      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.90%   58.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1193     1193              
  Lines      112723   112722       -1     
  Branches     5013     5013              
==========================================
- Hits        66394    66393       -1     
  Misses      45571    45571              
  Partials      758      758              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.05% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team December 7, 2025 11:44
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/logos-0.x branch from 4734a24 to ff05dbc Compare December 19, 2025 23:11
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Dec 19, 2025

PR Summary

Update logos to 0.16.0 and switch lexer config to #[logos(utf8 = false)], with corresponding lockfile updates.

  • Dependencies:
    • Bump logos from 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 in Cargo.toml (with related logos-derive/logos-codegen updates).
  • Lexer:
    • Update libs/@local/hashql/syntax-jexpr/src/lexer/token_kind.rs: replace #[logos(source = [u8])] with #[logos(utf8 = false)].
  • Build:
    • Regenerate Cargo.lock with transitive dependency resolution changes.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit c48355b. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 20, 2025 14:04 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Dec 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team December 20, 2025 14:25
@indietyp indietyp requested a review from TimDiekmann December 20, 2025 14:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-35.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$37.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-84.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.865 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.31 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.26 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.63 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.44 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.22 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.92 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.83 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.19 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.81 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.40 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$70.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$407 \mathrm{ms} \pm 772 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$82.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$84.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$247 \mathrm{ms} \pm 597 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.734 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$81.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$47.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.753 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$60.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.082 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$45.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$68.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.351 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$59.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$59.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 471 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$542 \mathrm{ms} \pm 950 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants