Update napi Rust crates to v3 (major)

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
napi	workspace.dependencies	major	2.16.17 -> 3.0.0
napi-derive	workspace.dependencies	major	2.16.13 -> 3.0.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

napi-rs/napi-rs (napi)

v3.7.1

Compare Source

Other

• clippy fix for Rust 1.92.0 (#​3058)

v3.7.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi) provide unsafe as_mut on ArrayBuffer (#​3055)
• (napi) support Promise.resolve/reject (#​3053)

v3.6.1

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-sys

v3.6.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi-derive) add tracing feature for debug logging NAPI function calls (#​3041)
• (napi) add node_api_create_object_with_properties support for enum creation (#​2990)

Fixed

• (napi) bigInt comparison (#​3039)
• (napi) shutdown runtime at env cleanup on windows (#​3026)

Other

• (napi) add back pub NODE_VERSION_* (#​3046)
• (sys) add back non dyn-symbols behavior (#​3045)
• (napi) add Eq and PartialEq trait to BigInt (#​3033)
• update MSRV in README.md (#​3023)

v3.5.2

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-build

v3.5.1

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) TypedArraySlice creation (#​3004)

Other

• (napi) Promise and ThreadsafeFunction::call_async don't require tokio (#​2998)

v3.5.0

Compare Source

Added

• (sys) use libloading to load napi symbols at runtime on all platform (#​2996)

Fixed

• (napi) memory leak in PromiseRaw cleanup callback (#​2995)

Other

• (napi) mark tsfn data as pub and split SendableResolver to indent file (#​2992)
• (napi) mark SendableResolver and PromiseRaw as pub (#​2981)
• add sponsors

v3.4.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi-derive) add tracing feature for debug logging NAPI function calls (#​3041)

Fixed

• (deps) update rust crate convert_case to 0.10 (#​3031)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi-derive) add discriminant_case to allow changing case of discriminant (#​2960)

Fixed

• (deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.6.0 (#​2951)

Other

• (napi) bump rust-version (#​2966)

v3.2.4

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.3

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) link issue on cargo test --features noop (#​2872)
• (deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.5.0 (#​2865)

v3.2.2

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.1

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi) add ScopeGenerator trait (#​2831)
• make generator an iterator (#​2784)

v3.1.6

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) async task finally is not called (#​2824) This was introduced in #​2786, released in 3.1.0

v3.1.5

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) relax the lifetime restriction in PromiseRaw callbacks (#​2819)

v3.1.4

Compare Source

Fixed

• (napi) the generic trait rectiction of Env::spawn should be ScopedTask (#​2817)

v3.1.3

Compare Source

Other

• (napi) optimize HashMap allocation in FromNapiValue implementation for HashMap (#​2796)

v3.1.2

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.1.1

Compare Source

Other

• updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.1.0

Compare Source

Added

• (napi) provide ScopedTask to resolve JsValue with lifetime (#​2786)

Other

• pin release-plz action

v3.0.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.69%. Comparing base (93c0279) to head (e6a2935).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7647      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.44%   58.69%   +0.25%     
==========================================
  Files        1181     1183       +2     
  Lines      111529   112003     +474     
  Branches     5012     5017       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        65180    65740     +560     
+ Misses      45592    45505      -87     
- Partials      757      758       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.20% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.77% <ø> (+2.01%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Nov 29, 2025 8:51pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Update napi and napi-derive workspace dependencies from v2.x to v3.0.0.

• Dependencies:
  • Bump napi from 2.16.17 to 3.0.0 in Cargo.toml.
  • Bump napi-derive from 2.16.13 to 3.0.0 in Cargo.toml.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e6a2935. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-40.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-51.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.460 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.554 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.781 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 456 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$416 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.949 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$94.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$309 \mathrm{ms} \pm 812 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$92.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 354 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$593 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph