Skip to content

Conversation

@czerwinskilukasz1
Copy link

Sample server response which was not handled before this fix:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<methodResponse>
<params>
<param>
<value><struct>
<member>
<name>task_id</name>
<value><string>56c66c8afbc8c16bd18641c6</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>answer_id</name>
<value><string>0a32d8d0-a2bc-42bd-8599-6764c31ff775</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>url</name>
<value><undefined>undefined</undefined></value>
</member>
</struct>
</value>
</param>
</params>
</methodResponse>

@gggeek
Copy link
Owner

gggeek commented Feb 28, 2016

Sorry, but I must have missed the version of the spec or the proposed extension where the 'undefined' xml element is mentioned.

I suspect that the presence of 'undefined' might be the result of bad coding in the app using the library (or in the remote xmlrpc server), and that it should be fixed there.

Can you provide me with a pointer?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants