Skip to content

Conversation

@peterfour
Copy link

Added the ProtonDB button next to the PCGamingWiki.
I find myself wanting to go from the store directly to the protondb website to see how the game run on linux.

I find that it makes it a lot easier

@peterfour
Copy link
Author

Just realised the README image might need updating as well.
Let me know if the image should be changed as well to include the proton db button @xPaw

@ejenk0
Copy link

ejenk0 commented Nov 25, 2025

I also think an optional line indicating a product's status on protondb (borked, bronze, silver, gold, platinum) along with the corresponding badge would be really useful. For example right here:

image

@peterfour
Copy link
Author

Don't know if that would make sense to include data unrelated to SteamDB in a steamdb extension, that's why I limited the pr to only showing a button since it was already doing it for PCGaming wiki, but we'll see

@krmckone
Copy link

krmckone commented Dec 5, 2025

I haven't looked to see in depth how extensive there's configuration options for various things like that but maybe it's worth a checkbox to hide/show protondb status in addition to the direct link?

@xPaw
Copy link
Member

xPaw commented Dec 5, 2025

As I've said before, there's already a protondb extension which shows the actual status, not just a link. Why not work with that?

@peterfour
Copy link
Author

peterfour commented Dec 5, 2025

As I've said before, there's already a protondb extension which shows the actual status, not just a link. Why not work with that?

Hum that's true, my way of seeing it was that having the button would be handy when I do need it, but the rest of the time keeping the page simple. I don't necessarily need to see the proton rating everytime, just a quick way to get to the page if I want to check it.
Same with the pcgamingwiki, we could potentially also have the data for ultrawide, high fps etc, but the button is enough for punctual checks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants