Skip to content

Adding TearDown to dump the context (base test class) #5200

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
bartekwasielak wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adding TearDown to dump the context (base test class) #5200

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
33 changes: 33 additions & 0 deletions src/ServiceControl.AcceptanceTesting/NServiceBusAcceptanceTest.cs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
namespace ServiceControl.AcceptanceTesting
{
using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading;
using NServiceBus.AcceptanceTesting;
using NServiceBus.AcceptanceTesting.Customization;
using NServiceBus.Logging;
using NUnit.Framework;
using NUnit.Framework.Interfaces;
using NUnit.Framework.Internal;

/// <summary>
/// Base class for all the NSB test that sets up our conventions
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -35,5 +39,34 @@ public void SetUp()
return testName + "." + endpointBuilder;
};
}

[TearDown]
public void TearDown()
{
if (!TestExecutionContext.CurrentContext.TryGetRunDescriptor(out var runDescriptor))
{
return;
}

var scenarioContext = runDescriptor.ScenarioContext;

TestContext.Out.WriteLine($@"Test settings:
{string.Join(Environment.NewLine, runDescriptor.Settings.Select(setting => $" {setting.Key}: {setting.Value}"))}");

TestContext.Out.WriteLine($@"Context:
{string.Join(Environment.NewLine, scenarioContext.GetType().GetProperties().Select(p => $"{p.Name} = {p.GetValue(scenarioContext, null)}"))}");

if (TestExecutionContext.CurrentContext.CurrentResult.ResultState == ResultState.Failure || TestExecutionContext.CurrentContext.CurrentResult.ResultState == ResultState.Error)
{
TestContext.Out.WriteLine(string.Empty);
TestContext.Out.WriteLine($"Log entries (log level: {scenarioContext.LogLevel}):");
TestContext.Out.WriteLine("--- Start log entries ---------------------------------------------------");
foreach (var logEntry in scenarioContext.Logs)
{
TestContext.Out.WriteLine($"{logEntry.Timestamp:T} {logEntry.Level} {logEntry.Endpoint ?? TestContext.CurrentContext.Test.Name}: {logEntry.Message}");
}
TestContext.Out.WriteLine("--- End log entries ---------------------------------------------------");
}
Comment on lines +59 to +69
Copy link
Member

@SzymonPobiega SzymonPobiega Nov 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that SC seems to have its own mechanism of printing logs, I think we can remove this part (as first imperfect step towards better debugging ability)

}
}
}