Skip to content

Commit 0461f45

Browse files
AlexicaWrightrenetapopovagem-neo4jlidiazuin
authored
5.x cherry pick dev (#115)
* resolved conflicts * resolved conflicts * Update the documentation for procedures and functions to have up to date code examples from linked github repo. (#97) (#101) Co-authored-by: Gem Lamont <106068376+gem-neo4j@users.noreply.github.com> * Adding information about the version of junit used in the example (#103) (#106) * adding information about the version of junit used in the example and note with instructions for users who want to keep using a previous version * update after review * removing incorrect extra lines * adding the information that this can also be applied to neo4j 5 instead of just 4 * Update modules/ROOT/pages/extending-neo4j/procedures.adoc --------- Co-authored-by: Jessica Wright <49636617+AlexicaWright@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com> Co-authored-by: Gem Lamont <106068376+gem-neo4j@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lidia Zuin <102308961+lidiazuin@users.noreply.github.com>
1 parent c74d076 commit 0461f45

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

modules/ROOT/pages/transaction-management.adoc

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ The existence of the `+SET n._LOCK_+` statement before the read of the `n.prop`
158158
[[transactions-locking]]
159159
== Default locking behavior
160160

161-
* When adding, changing, or removing a property on a node or relationship a write lock is taken on the specific node or relationship.
161+
* When adding, changing, or removing a property on a node or relationship, a write lock is taken on the specific node or relationship.
162162
* When creating or deleting a node a write lock is taken for the specific node.
163163
* When creating or deleting a relationship a write lock is taken on the specific relationship and both its nodes.
164164

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)