Clarify provenance of models in benchmarks.jl #467
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently some models have comments containing links to sources, but this info is not systematic and may be not convenient to use.
So, I asked GPT-5:
It produced
benchmarking/bib/. Note: some entries are not correct. My plan currently is to go model by model, verify the .bib file, and then add it in the:citefield inbenchmarks.jl, as below:Example
Design
:citefield somehow.Progress
Model Verification Checklist
Notes
The AI fared fairly well. For example, it recognized that Akt and Fujita is actually the same model. It did not create entries for QY and St because it could not verify their origin (rightfully so).